AI software / SaaS Creators on LinkedIn: 2,110 Indexed, 272 Grade A
Koinon Link currently indexes 2,110 AI software / SaaS creators on LinkedIn. Below is the real structure of that pool — not the platform at large, but what is left after filtering.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Creators indexed | 2,110 |
| Grade A (contact these first) | 272 (13%) |
| Grade B | 26 (1%) |
| Average authenticity score | 9 / 100 |
| With public contact details | 0 (0%) |
| With recent content captured | 0 (0%) |
| Median follower count | 0 |
| Suspected bought-follower accounts quarantined | 1 (excluded above) |
How to read these numbers: this covers creators indexed and validated inside Koinon Link, not every creator on the platform. Suspected bought-follower accounts are quarantined and excluded from the table above (shown separately). The authenticity score is our own anomaly detection over follower/engagement structure, not a platform-official metric. Figures update as collection continues.
Breakdown by sub-niche
| Segment | Creators | Share |
|---|---|---|
| iGaming / crypto casino | 3 | 0% |
Top 6 countries
| Segment | Creators | Share |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 0% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 0% |
| Ireland | 1 | 0% |
| Spain | 1 | 0% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 0% |
| China | 1 | 0% |
What to look at first on LinkedIn
Follower count is the least useful thing to sort by. Median followers for AI software / SaaS creators on LinkedIn is 0, meaning half the pool is smaller than that — and what actually decides whether a campaign works is whether their audience is your customer.
A practical order: (1) narrow by sub-niche first (the largest segments above); (2) then check authenticity — this pool averages 9/100, and anything well below that deserves a look at whether follower growth came in vertical steps; (3) contactability last — 0% publish contact details on LinkedIn, and a low share is normal since DMs remain the main channel.
Why 1 accounts sit in quarantine
These accounts look fine on follower count, but their follower structure or engagement ratio shows clear anomalies. They are not deleted — just moved out of default results, so budget does not go to bought audiences. That is also why "creators indexed" above is smaller than the raw crawl.