Khushi Agarwal (@Aicoder786) on X (Twitter)

This page is public and can appear in search results. The audience and topic lines below are AI-inferred and may be wrong.
Claim this page → · Correct it, take it out of search, or remove it →

Khushi Agarwal is a creator on X (Twitter) in the 2K–3K follower range, publishing for Founders and tech marketers who want to leverage AI tools for visibility and growth, especially those focused on prompt engineering and LLMs like Claude. Profile last checked 2026-07-06.

Observed facts (from the public profile):

Profile bio

Ai & Tech marketing agency // Strong networks on linkedin & X // Helping Founders & Brands to get maximum visibilty // DM me Collab

What this creator posts about, and who reads it (AI-inferred)

Recurring topics: Claude AI courses and prompting, LLM architecture lectures, Free AI automation tutorials, Stanford AI content recommendations

Audience: Founders and tech marketers who want to leverage AI tools for visibility and growth, especially those focused on prompt engineering and LLMs like Claude

Provenance: inferred by AI from public content, not stated by the creator — confidence 0.40 · read from 5 recent posts · updated 20 days ago.

Audience read from this creator’s own recent posts, not from platform-declared categories. It is our reading, and it can be wrong.

Recent content samples (what the inference above was drawn from)

How to Try Claude Code Without Paying Full Price (2026) Credit : Nick Saraev https://t.co/UCXdj7FiOV

Instead of watching an hour of Netflix, watch this 2 hour hour Stanford lecture will teach you more about how LLMs like ChatGPT and Claude are built than most people working at top AI companies learn in their entire…

INSTEAD OF WATCHING NETFLIX TONIGHT. Spend 1 hour with this. Claude AI FULL COURSE that teaches you how to BUILD and AUTOMATE anything. The people who watch this tonight will wake up tomorrow with a new skill. Watch it…

🚨 Anthropic just showed a 27-minute workshop on how to actually do prompts for Claude. Taught by the people who built it. Free. No registration. No paywall. I've seen $300 courses that don't cover what they teach in…

See the original post on X (Twitter)

Where this creator sits among comparable accounts

Compared with the 3,045 accounts in the same group (x · nano · software):

This is a position, not a verdict. A percentile says where this account falls among comparable accounts on signals we can measure — it does not say this creator is a better fit for your campaign. We ran a blind benchmark and measured no reliable advantage in selection quality, and do not claim one.

Koinon Link indexes X (Twitter) creators in Software with grade, authenticity and contactability broken down — see the X (Twitter) × Software breakdown, or the Creator Index Report for the whole index.

Other Software creators on X (Twitter)

• Aje / the Gohighlevel Guy (@Aje_Dynamicz) — AI automation for revenue systems
• Akaniyene Akpan (AKOB) (@AkanInyne1) — Advanced Claude/AI use cases for marketers
• Zenith_Ai (@Alam_coder) — AI productivity tools
• Aleksandar Jovanovic (@AleksDoesCode) — indie hacker revenue transparency
• Alex the Engineer (@AlexEngineerAI) — No-code AI chatbots for websites
• Alexmightypower (@AlexMightyPower) — Practical AI tools for wealth generation
• ALEXYZ (@Alexvx_nft) — AI agents for ad creation
• Alex Wyatt / Meta Ad Creatives (@Alexwyatt47) — Customer desire and language insights

Creators next to this one by follower tier in the same slice. Each link opens that creator’s public profile — what they post about and who reads it, with no contact details.

This page lists public profile information only. It carries no contact details and no authenticity score. If you are Khushi Agarwal and want this page removed, request removal.

Machine-readable representations

Structured twins of this page for AI and agents — every inferred field carries its source, confidence and freshness.

• /kol/x/Aicoder786.json
• /kol/x/Aicoder786.md

AI retrieval activity

What AI systems have actually done with this page. The two kinds are counted separately: being indexed is not the same as being used.