John Pitts (@EquityDiamonds) on X (Twitter)
This page is public and can appear in search results. The audience and topic lines below are AI-inferred and may be wrong.
Claim this page → · Correct it, take it out of search, or remove it →
John Pitts is a creator on X (Twitter) in the 3K–4K follower range, publishing for Crypto investors and enthusiasts focused on Bitcoin fundamentals, market cycles, and early-stage blockchain opportunities. Profile last checked 2026-07-05.
Observed facts (from the public profile):
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Platform | X (Twitter) |
| Handle | @EquityDiamonds |
| Followers | 3K–4K |
| Indexed under | Finance · Crypto |
| Audience function | general AI enthusiasts |
Profile bio
Seeking equity Diamonds in the Rough (#DITR). 💡@SLictionary💡 @PiZeroOne. Medium= @EquityDiamonds. SeekingAlpha= i^2=j^2=k^2=ijk=-1. $JOHNPITTS Handcash
What this creator posts about, and who reads it (AI-inferred)
Recurring topics: Bitcoin price manipulation, Wash trading on exchanges, Binance CZ accountability, BSV holder volumes
Audience: Crypto investors and enthusiasts focused on Bitcoin fundamentals, market cycles, and early-stage blockchain opportunities
Provenance: inferred by AI from public content, not stated by the creator — confidence 0.40 · read from 7 recent posts · updated 20 days ago.
Audience read from this creator’s own recent posts, not from platform-declared categories. It is our reading, and it can be wrong.
Recent content samples (what the inference above was drawn from)
WAY too complicated ⬇️ of an experiment. Same experiment can be done by anyone and for easy money— in any era of time. Next time you need your brakes replaced, go to the nicest neighborhood in your local area and get a…
There is a couple of key points you need to know to put all things Satoshi Nakamoto into perspective: 1. btc has no value to Satoshi unless he is a crook and a liar. The concept is simple: btc is toxic waste. How that…
LOST BITCOIN A micro-article by John Pitts There seems to be confusion here about the topic of conversation when it comes to discussing Bitcoin wallets: when there is talk about the viability of seed phrases, we are…
HANG’EM HIGH a micro-article by John Pitts “It started as an act of unspeakable violence; it ended on a rope” Here’s a movie trailer I recommend watching instead of this charade of a Legislature hearing today… 🎥…
See the original post on X (Twitter)
Where this creator sits among comparable accounts
Compared with the 1,860 accounts in the same group (x · nano · gaming):
| Dimension | Percentile in group |
|---|---|
| Overall | 97th |
| Authenticity | 89th |
| Engagement quality | 87th |
| Audience value | 83rd |
| Focus & activity | 52nd |
This is a position, not a verdict. A percentile says where this account falls among comparable accounts on signals we can measure — it does not say this creator is a better fit for your campaign. We ran a blind benchmark and measured no reliable advantage in selection quality, and do not claim one.
Koinon Link indexes X (Twitter) creators in Finance with grade, authenticity and contactability broken down — see the X (Twitter) × Finance breakdown, or the Creator Index Report for the whole index.
Other Finance creators on X (Twitter)
- Er. Vipin (@Er_Vpin) — Price-Volume Action
- Eric 🍥 (@EricOnchain) — fintech ad creative quality
- Eric (@Eric_Wots) — Airdrop farming results
- Ugo Simba (🪶,🦁) (@EvandaEscobar) — Meme coins and bull runs
- FunkyTown Bytes (@FTBytes) — Order flow analysis
- chisom ukadike (@Favichyke_) — World Cup monetization hacks
- Crier ⌬ (@Favour_D_Crier) — Hyperliquid trading and funded accounts
- @FinalFame — $frong trading and entries
Creators next to this one by follower tier in the same slice. Each link opens that creator’s public profile — what they post about and who reads it, with no contact details.
This page lists public profile information only. It carries no contact details and no authenticity score. If you are John Pitts and want this page removed, request removal.
Machine-readable representations
Structured twins of this page for AI and agents — every inferred field carries its source, confidence and freshness.
AI retrieval activity
What AI systems have actually done with this page. The two kinds are counted separately: being indexed is not the same as being used.
| Kind | Requests | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Indexing crawlers | 9 | Bulk indexing · Amazonbot, Applebot, ClaudeBot, Meta, PerplexityBot |
| User-triggered retrievals | 0 | none recorded yet |
Is this you? Claim this page.
Claim it to verify your identity, correct anything we got wrong, and add context only you have. Free, no account needed.
Claim this page →