Deno (@denogrowth) on X (Twitter)
This page is public and can appear in search results. The audience and topic lines below are AI-inferred and may be wrong.
Claim this page → · Correct it, take it out of search, or remove it →
Deno is a creator on X (Twitter) in the 2K–3K follower range, publishing for AI engineers and technical builders focused on growth/distribution systems and large model deployment, based in United Kingdom. Profile last checked 2026-07-06.
Observed facts (from the public profile):
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Platform | X (Twitter) |
| Handle | @denogrowth |
| Followers | 2K–3K |
| Indexed under | Software · AI tools / agents |
| Market | United Kingdom |
| Audience function | developers |
Profile bio
i build AI systems for growth + distribution. sharing what actually works (and what doesn't)
What this creator posts about, and who reads it (AI-inferred)
Recurring topics: ChatGPT/model mention dynamics, AI compliance and liability allocation, large open-weight models for complex tasks
Audience: AI engineers and technical builders focused on growth/distribution systems and large model deployment
Provenance: inferred by AI from public content, not stated by the creator — confidence 0.40 · read from 3 recent posts · updated 67 days ago.
Audience read from this creator’s own recent posts, not from platform-declared categories. It is our reading, and it can be wrong.
Recent content samples (what the inference above was drawn from)
your brand's mentions inside chatgpt can fall without you shipping a single change. a new default model means new weights, and the associations from the old one do not carry over. it behaves like a search ranking update…
who actually carries this compliance load, the lab or the product built on top of it? mostly the lab. the obligations attach to whoever places the general purpose model on the market. the part worth knowing: modify a…
2.4 trillion parameters, open weights, built for long-horizon tasks. > long-horizon means jobs that run hundreds of steps, not one prompt > at 99% reliability per step, a 200 step task still fails about 87% of the time…
See the original post on X (Twitter)
Where this creator sits among comparable accounts
Compared with the 3,045 accounts in the same group (x · nano · software):
| Dimension | Percentile in group |
|---|---|
| Overall | 50th |
| Authenticity | 58th |
| Engagement quality | 30th |
| Focus & activity | 66th |
This is a position, not a verdict. A percentile says where this account falls among comparable accounts on signals we can measure — it does not say this creator is a better fit for your campaign. We ran a blind benchmark and measured no reliable advantage in selection quality, and do not claim one.
Koinon Link indexes X (Twitter) creators in Software with grade, authenticity and contactability broken down — see the X (Twitter) × Software breakdown, or the Creator Index Report for the whole index.
Other Software creators on X (Twitter)
- Denys Linkov (@denyslinkov) — ML engineering courses at UofT
- Developers Digest (@devdigest) — AI turning non-coders into framework builders
- Robbie Jack (@devevangelist) — Ad spend management
- Dev Hunt (@devhunt_) — Dev tool launches
- Avdhesh Singh (@digitalavdhesh) — AI impact on SEO and search visibility
- Dimeji - B2B SaaS Marketing Strategist (@dimeji_san) — B2B SaaS acquisition systems
- Dimitar Angelov (@dimitarangg) — B2B outbound systems on email/LinkedIn/X
- DL Research (@dl_research) — RWAfi market reports and tokenization trends
Creators next to this one by follower tier in the same slice. Each link opens that creator’s public profile — what they post about and who reads it, with no contact details.
This page lists public profile information only. It carries no contact details and no authenticity score. If you are Deno and want this page removed, request removal.
Machine-readable representations
Structured twins of this page for AI and agents — every inferred field carries its source, confidence and freshness.
AI retrieval activity
What AI systems have actually done with this page. The two kinds are counted separately: being indexed is not the same as being used.
| Kind | Requests | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Indexing crawlers | 7 | Bulk indexing · Amazonbot, Applebot, ClaudeBot, Meta, PerplexityBot |
| User-triggered retrievals | 0 | none recorded yet |
Is this you? Claim this page.
Claim it to verify your identity, correct anything we got wrong, and add context only you have. Free, no account needed.
Claim this page →