Mikhail Rogov (@i_mika_el) on X (Twitter)

This page is public and can appear in search results. The audience and topic lines below are AI-inferred and may be wrong.
Claim this page → · Correct it, take it out of search, or remove it →

Mikhail Rogov is a creator on X (Twitter) in the 2K–3K follower range, publishing for Software developers and AI engineers who build with agents, manage side projects, and grow in public on X. Profile last checked 2026-07-03.

Observed facts (from the public profile):

Profile bio

Dad of two. AI Engineering Lead. Built software for unicorns. Now starting from 0 in public to own my time.

What this creator posts about, and who reads it (AI-inferred)

Recurring topics: AI agents and CLI tooling replacing IDEs, LLM code generation policies and review practices, Refactor vs rewrite debates in real codebases, Side project economics and cost tracking, Public building and reply-driven growth on X

Audience: Software developers and AI engineers who build with agents, manage side projects, and grow in public on X

Provenance: inferred by AI from public content, not stated by the creator — confidence 0.40 · read from 6 recent posts · updated 78 days ago.

Audience read from this creator’s own recent posts, not from platform-declared categories. It is our reading, and it can be wrong.

Recent content samples (what the inference above was drawn from)

half of devs: never rewrite. refactor, respect the scars. other half: burn it down. has a rewrite ever actually worked for you? 😅

rust just banned LLM-written code in their repos. LLM review and analysis: allowed. writing: no. so, genuinely asking: what’s your actual system for when the AI writes vs when you do? mine is “vibes” and I know that’s…

CLI agents already won. the IDE is a legacy interface — most devs just haven’t noticed yet.

side project math, be honest: total spent vs total earned 😅 I’ll go first: 1759 / 0 usd

See the original post on X (Twitter)

Where this creator sits among comparable accounts

Compared with the 3,045 accounts in the same group (x · nano · software):

This is a position, not a verdict. A percentile says where this account falls among comparable accounts on signals we can measure — it does not say this creator is a better fit for your campaign. We ran a blind benchmark and measured no reliable advantage in selection quality, and do not claim one.

Koinon Link indexes X (Twitter) creators in Software with grade, authenticity and contactability broken down — see the X (Twitter) × Software breakdown, or the Creator Index Report for the whole index.

Other Software creators on X (Twitter)

• Kapil Batra (@iamKapilBatra) — Salesforce AI integrations with Claude
• Tektek (@iam_tektek) — AI as business lever
• W (@iama12x) — Using Cursor AI
• Cameron England (@iamcamengland) — Agency scaling metrics
• Dominus Pellissier (@iamdomprompt) — Prompt engineering for realistic AI fashion and vibe visuals
• E L I J A H (@iamelijahkhan) — RevenueCat integrations
• Soham Dasgupta (@iamsoham) — LLM and RAG implementations
• Ansh Bhatnagar (@iansh04_) — AI tools lists

Creators next to this one by follower tier in the same slice. Each link opens that creator’s public profile — what they post about and who reads it, with no contact details.

This page lists public profile information only. It carries no contact details and no authenticity score. If you are Mikhail Rogov and want this page removed, request removal.

Machine-readable representations

Structured twins of this page for AI and agents — every inferred field carries its source, confidence and freshness.

• /kol/x/i_mika_el.json
• /kol/x/i_mika_el.md

AI retrieval activity

What AI systems have actually done with this page. The two kinds are counted separately: being indexed is not the same as being used.