Ross (@rossbulat) on X (Twitter)

Updated 2026-06-30

This page is public and can appear in search results. The audience and topic lines below are AI-inferred and may be wrong.
Claim this page → · Correct it, take it out of search, or remove it →

Ross is a creator on X (Twitter) in the 1K–2K follower range, publishing for Polkadot validators and blockchain staking operators, primarily software engineers and technical operators managing node operations. Profile last checked 2026-06-30.

Observed facts (from the public profile):

FieldValue
PlatformX (Twitter)
Handle@rossbulat
Followers1K–2K
Audience functiondevelopers

Profile bio

Director of JKRB. 软件工程师。

What this creator posts about, and who reads it (AI-inferred)

Recurring topics: Polkadot staking rewards, Dynamic Allocation Pool (DAP), Reward distribution splits, Validator and nominator incentives

Audience: Polkadot validators and blockchain staking operators, primarily software engineers and technical operators managing node operations

Provenance: inferred by AI from public content, not stated by the creator — confidence 0.40 · read from 4 recent posts · updated 29 days ago.

Audience read from this creator’s own recent posts, not from platform-declared categories. It is our reading, and it can be wrong.

Recent content samples (what the inference above was drawn from)

True story. #Polkadot polkadot:native https://t.co/H6lglMx82J
Stay in the loop ☁️ We’ve added a new headline ticker to the https://t.co/n0EIVBSVD0 homepage, putting the latest announcements and updates front and center, so you can catch what’s new at a glance. #Polkadot $DOT…
100% reward DOT retained. 100% compounded. Not every month will achieve 100% retention—but transparent reporting and a clear commitment to retaining and compounding $DOT should be the standard for validators. Nominate…
A one-month snapshot from one of Polkadot’s largest validator operators shows 0% of rewards compounded and 0% retained during the period. These metrics are coming soon to the Polkadot Staking Dashboard, giving…

See the original post on X (Twitter)

Where this creator sits among comparable accounts

Compared with the 3,045 accounts in the same group (x · nano · software):

DimensionPercentile in group
Overall96th
Authenticity85th
Engagement quality81st
Focus & activity66th

This is a position, not a verdict. A percentile says where this account falls among comparable accounts on signals we can measure — it does not say this creator is a better fit for your campaign. We ran a blind benchmark and measured no reliable advantage in selection quality, and do not claim one.

See the Creator Index Report for how this index is structured.

Other X (Twitter) creators in this index

Creators next to this one by follower tier in the same slice. Each link opens that creator’s public profile — what they post about and who reads it, with no contact details.

This page lists public profile information only. It carries no contact details and no authenticity score. If you are Ross and want this page removed, request removal.

Machine-readable representations

Structured twins of this page for AI and agents — every inferred field carries its source, confidence and freshness.

AI retrieval activity

What AI systems have actually done with this page. The two kinds are counted separately: being indexed is not the same as being used.

KindRequestsWhat it means
Indexing crawlers6Bulk indexing · Amazonbot, Applebot, ClaudeBot
User-triggered retrievals0none recorded yet

Is this you? Claim this page.

Claim it to verify your identity, correct anything we got wrong, and add context only you have. Free, no account needed.

Claim this page →