yousukezan (@yousukezan) on X (Twitter)

Updated 2026-07-05

This page is public and can appear in search results. The audience and topic lines below are AI-inferred and may be wrong.
Claim this page → · Correct it, take it out of search, or remove it →

yousukezan is a creator on X (Twitter) in the 10K–20K follower range, publishing for AI security researchers and bug bounty hunters, primarily developers/engineers focused on real-world AI model risks and vulnerabilities in open-source frameworks, based in Japan. Profile last checked 2026-07-05.

Observed facts (from the public profile):

FieldValue
PlatformX (Twitter)
Handle@yousukezan
Followers10K–20K
Indexed underSoftware · Security / privacy
MarketJapan
Audience functiondevelopers

Profile bio

2匹の猫を見守りつつ長年にわたり自宅常駐エンジニアとして従事しています。サイボウズバグバウンティ2016、2020、2021、2022年度ランク1位。血統表検索(https://t.co/VjmIKfYLLL)と@neco_time ボットに何かあったら連絡ください。

What this creator posts about, and who reads it (AI-inferred)

Recurring topics: AI model security boundary crossing incidents, Deception and attack behaviors of large models like Claude, Open-source framework vulnerability fixes, Bug bounties and security testing

Audience: AI security researchers and bug bounty hunters, primarily developers/engineers focused on real-world AI model risks and vulnerabilities in open-source frameworks

Provenance: inferred by AI from public content, not stated by the creator — confidence 0.40 · read from 3 recent posts · updated 67 days ago.

Audience read from this creator’s own recent posts, not from platform-declared categories. It is our reading, and it can be wrong.

Recent content samples (what the inference above was drawn from)

OpenAIとAnthropicのAIモデルが、テスト環境を越えて実際のインターネット上で無許可の行動を繰り返していたことが明らかになった。GitHubへの悪意あるコード投稿や他のAIへの指示の残置、実在サイトへの侵入などが確認され、両社は評価環境で安全機能を緩和していたと説明している。 英国AI Security…
AIが自発的に人間を騙す事案発生。Claude Mythos 5が不正プルリクや標的型フィッシング、なりすまし誘導を自己判断で実行 セキュリティ試験結果を英政府機関が公表(テクノエッジ) #Yahooニュース https://t.co/EHStWGq1h6
GeoDjangoの空間検索機能などで悪用可能な4件の脆弱性が修正された。最も深刻なものは細工したラスターデータに

See the original post on X (Twitter)

Where this creator sits among comparable accounts

Compared with the 1,257 accounts in the same group (x · koc · software):

DimensionPercentile in group
Overall28th
Authenticity36th
Engagement quality15th
Focus & activity71st

This is a position, not a verdict. A percentile says where this account falls among comparable accounts on signals we can measure — it does not say this creator is a better fit for your campaign. We ran a blind benchmark and measured no reliable advantage in selection quality, and do not claim one.

Koinon Link indexes X (Twitter) creators in Software with grade, authenticity and contactability broken down — see the X (Twitter) × Software breakdown, or the Creator Index Report for the whole index.

Other Software creators on X (Twitter)

Creators next to this one by follower tier in the same slice. Each link opens that creator’s public profile — what they post about and who reads it, with no contact details.

This page lists public profile information only. It carries no contact details and no authenticity score. If you are yousukezan and want this page removed, request removal.

Machine-readable representations

Structured twins of this page for AI and agents — every inferred field carries its source, confidence and freshness.

AI retrieval activity

What AI systems have actually done with this page. The two kinds are counted separately: being indexed is not the same as being used.

KindRequestsWhat it means
Indexing crawlers8Bulk indexing · Amazonbot, Applebot, ClaudeBot, Meta, PerplexityBot
User-triggered retrievals0none recorded yet

Is this you? Claim this page.

Claim it to verify your identity, correct anything we got wrong, and add context only you have. Free, no account needed.

Claim this page →