Richard Ngo (@RichardMCNgo) on X (Twitter)

This page is public and can appear in search results. The audience and topic lines below are AI-inferred and may be wrong.
Claim this page → · Correct it, take it out of search, or remove it →

Richard Ngo is a creator on X (Twitter) in the 80K–90K follower range, publishing for AI alignment researchers, philosophers, and technical thinkers focused on AI safety, uncertainty, and long-term civilizational outcomes, based in United States. Profile last checked 2026-07-07.

Observed facts (from the public profile):

Profile bio

natural philosopher

What this creator posts about, and who reads it (AI-inferred)

Recurring topics: AI alignment field critiques, Knightian uncertainty and imprecise probabilities, Incentives and self-interest in AI and civilization, AI 2040 scenarios and long-term futures

Audience: AI alignment researchers, philosophers, and technical thinkers focused on AI safety, uncertainty, and long-term civilizational outcomes

Provenance: inferred by AI from public content, not stated by the creator — confidence 0.40 · read from 4 recent posts · updated 67 days ago.

Audience read from this creator’s own recent posts, not from platform-declared categories. It is our reading, and it can be wrong.

Recent content samples (what the inference above was drawn from)

The field of alignment is full of people who, if Darwin himself had explained natural selection to them, would have asked “but is this useful for getting more milk from cows?” And somehow despite that it’s still the…

I suspect davidad’s conception of imprecise probabilities could provide a foundation for formalizing Knightian uncertainty. One intuition: Knightian agents should divide the world into regions gradated by how consistent…

It is not from the altruism of the professor, the programmer, or the politician, that we expect a flourishing civilization, but from their regard to their own integrity.

I’ve been working with the AI Futures Project to critique and improve their AI 2040 scenario. Ultimately I still have serious disagreements with it. However, to their credit, the team

See the original post on X (Twitter)

Where this creator sits among comparable accounts

Compared with the 1,257 accounts in the same group (x · koc · software):

This is a position, not a verdict. A percentile says where this account falls among comparable accounts on signals we can measure — it does not say this creator is a better fit for your campaign. We ran a blind benchmark and measured no reliable advantage in selection quality, and do not claim one.

Koinon Link indexes X (Twitter) creators in Software with grade, authenticity and contactability broken down — see the X (Twitter) × Software breakdown, or the Creator Index Report for the whole index.

Other Software creators on X (Twitter)

• The Jobfather ® 🇯🇲🇨🇦🇬🇧 (@TheJobfather_) — Resume structure and templates
• Robin Delta (@heyrobinai) — Gemini Omni Flash video capabilities
• Ifiok Nkem (@ifioknkem) — Building AI Agents
• Nico (@nicos_ai) — Meta Ads creative fatigue
• Salesforce Careers (@salesforcejobs) — Employee career stories and retention at Salesforce
• Starter Story (@starter_story) — App founder growth stories
• vas (@vasuman) — AI agents in production
• zCloak Network (@zCloakNetwork) — AI Agent Trust Protocol

Creators next to this one by follower tier in the same slice. Each link opens that creator’s public profile — what they post about and who reads it, with no contact details.

This page lists public profile information only. It carries no contact details and no authenticity score. If you are Richard Ngo and want this page removed, request removal.

Machine-readable representations

Structured twins of this page for AI and agents — every inferred field carries its source, confidence and freshness.

• /kol/x/RichardMCNgo.json
• /kol/x/RichardMCNgo.md

AI retrieval activity

What AI systems have actually done with this page. The two kinds are counted separately: being indexed is not the same as being used.